Business

Domestic Violence Australia and spousal visas

Domestic Violence Australia & Property Matters

The issue of family violence is current governed by both the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) and the Family Law Legislation Amendment (Domestic Violence Australia and Other Measures) Act 2011 (Cth). The recent amendments effectively change the Family Law Act to provide:

  • Greater protection from harm when determining the child’s best interests;
  • Changing the definition of ‘Family Violence’ and ‘Abuse’ to reflect a modern understanding of the terms;
  • Providing a wider scope for what Court’s may consider in relation to family violence orders;
  • Improving reporting requirements and Court’s access to evidence;
  • Allowing child protection authorities to participate in family law proceedings; and
  • Gender-neutral terms to mirror the Family Law Act.

Application to Proceedings

The recognized legal principle from the case of Kennon and Kennon [1997] FamCA 27 provides a party to proceedings which have been the victim of family violence may receive an additional percentage of the asset pool in their favor. To establish this argument, the victim of family violence must establish:

  1. A violent course of conduct occurred;
  2. During the marriage/relationship;
  3. Evidence of a significant adverse or discernible impact upon the party’s contributions to the marriage.

Requirement three essentially involves an argument that the contributions which were made by the victim of family violence in the marriage/relationship were made more arduous than they ought to have been. This argument is quite common where the Wife of the relationship has been subject to family violence by the Husband, which has caused her contributions as a home-maker to be more difficult. These arguments have been successfully applied in numerous cases, including Doherty & Doherty (1996) FLC 92-652, Marando&Marando (1997) FLC 92-754, and Coad & Coad [2011] FamCA 622.

Difficulties in Applying the Principle from Kennon

Whilst the application of this legal principle may seem straightforward, Altobelli FM in Kozovski&Kozovski[2009] FamCA 1014 discussed the difficulty in analyzing the required evidence to establish this argument. However, it appears that recent developments to section 55 and 56 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) and rule 10.12(d) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) may soften the application of admissible evidence to family violence matters. In the case of Britt & Britt (2017) FLC 93, the Full Family Court on appeal provided evidence that is probative, even slightly probative, will be admissible for the purpose of rationally affecting the determination of an issue. For evidence to be inadmissible, it must have no probative value.

Therefore, this also evidences to be admissible in relation to family violence where it may provide context to other evidence presented to the Court, establish the relationship of the parties in regard to finances, and, the credibility of each party.

Domestic Violence and Spousal Visas

The Department of Home Affairs guidelines provide certain persons applying for permanent residence in Australia to be able to continue this application following the breakdown of a marriage or relationship. Applicants within this process must provide evidence that either they or members of their family have been victims of domestic violence committed by the Australian partner. The requirements to continue this application are dependant upon the applicant demonstrating the relationship between the parties was genuine until ceasing, and, family violence took place during the relationship.

The categories of visas which consider the effect of family violence on the applicant include:

Partner (permanent) (subclass 100) visa;
Spouse (permanent) (subclass 100) visa;
Interdependency (permanent) (subclass 110);
Partner (temporary and permanent) (subclass 820/801) visas;
Spouse (temporary and permanent) (subclass 820/801) visas;
Interdependency (temporary and permanent) (subclass 826/814);
Established Business in Australia (subclass 845);
State/Territory Sponsored Regional Established Business in Australia (subclass 846);
Labour Agreement (subclass 855);
Employer Nomination Scheme (subclass 856);
Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme (subclass 857);
Distinguished Talent (subclass 858).

Source: https://www.jamesnoblelaw.com.au/domestic-violence-and-spousal-visas/

jnflbrisbane

James Noble Law is not a common practice. We're a family run, locally spirited and globally minded family law firm capable of handling any case in family law. James Noble Law are Brisbane Family Lawyers. Just Different.

Recent Posts

Chicago Cubs vs Milwaukee Brewers Match Player Stats – Full Scorecard & Key Highlights (2026)

The latest Chicago Cubs vs Milwaukee Brewers match Player States delivered an exciting showdown packed… Read More

3 days ago

Best Pickleball Courts in Vadodara: Top 5 Places to Play Right Now

Pickleball is growing fast in Vadodara! More and more people are picking up a paddle… Read More

6 days ago

Why the Master Lock System is Vital for Modern Security Solutions

Have you ever found yourself juggling a massive keyring, desperately searching for the right key… Read More

1 week ago

How Keyword Clustering Can Boost Your SEO Content Strategy

What if one well-keyword-optimized piece of content could outperform dozens of isolated posts? Today’s top… Read More

2 weeks ago

The Unmatched Versatility of the Qt8 Garments Jacket

Every few years, a piece of outerwear comes along that genuinely earns the description of… Read More

2 weeks ago

Premium Valet Parking Services in Singapore: The 2026 Guide

In the high-stakes corporate world, professional valet parking services in Singapore have evolved from a… Read More

2 weeks ago